Wednesday, May 11, 2005

Govt clamps down on land registration

Govt clamps down on land registration
Bans Transaction Without Conversion
The Times of India

Bangalore: A man who owns an eightacre land on Devanahalli Road is in a dilemma. He had fixed a price of Rs 35 lakh per acre and the buyer had paid Rs 10 lakh in advance. Now, the latter refuses to honour the agreement.

The reason? A Government Order (GO) issued on April 23 bans registration of flats and plots developed on agricultural land without land conversion from agricultural to non-agricultural purpose. Sources said the GO will definitely hit the revenues of seven city municipal councils and one town municipal council around Bangalore. One estimate is that 25% of Byatarayanapura CMC’s income will be lost — the loss could be Rs 2 crore to Rs 2.5 crore a year.

“After khata transfer, a person goes for plan sanction. Later, he seeks civic amenities. We will lose out on fees charged at each step,’’ the sources said.

Several CMC officials welcomed the GO. “Many layouts have come up in the green belt area, and this will help restrict that.’’ Already, prices are crashing. “Land prices per square foot have come down by Rs 200 to Rs 250. Everybody is feeling the pinch,’’ sources explained. They feared that construction activity — most real estate projects now come in the CMC areas — may come to a standstill.

But mutual understanding between seller and developer is also there. This is something the April 23 GO admits. It says “fabricated and bogus records’’ are used for property registration. Yelahanka CMC commissioner Mohammad Khalimulla said people used to get bogus khata certificates in his name. “Now, we have stopped issuing khata certificates totally,’’ he said, adding that his CMC has “no money at all’’.

Sources said the GO may be amended by exempting CMC and TMC areas from the order because of realtors’ pressure. But officials said the government must withstand that pressure. “Else, all of us will suffer in the years to come.’’

DRAWING THE LINE

CMCs can issue building licences, collect property taxes. They must also provide water, power, civic amenities. Layouts formed within 1,250 sqkm of Bangalore need to get BDA approval. The next area comes under BMRDA; areas beyond BMRDA fall in the town planning’s jurisdiction.

Babus flout land norms

Bangalore: The state government’s order banning registration of agricultural lands for non-agricultural purposes without conversion has opened the doors on questionable practices followed by government officials themselves.

Consider this: The owner of a six-acre plot of agricultural land fragmented a 55 ft x 40 ft piece. He applied to the Hassan deputy commissioner for conversion into residential land for forming a layout.

The DC approved it, with: “The layout and the plan should be approved by Hassan urban development authority or concerned town planning authority. Sites should not be distributed without approval. Adequate open spaces should be maintained as per rules.’’ Under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, in a layout, 50 per cent land is residential; 10 per cent for civic amenity sites; 15 per cent for parks and 25 per cent for roads.

“How can approval be given for a layout on a 55 ft X 40 ft plot? Can open spaces be maintained in this tiny area? This approval is a blatant violation of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act,’’ said state town planning department director V.M. Hegde.

The April 23 order is meant to curb such practices and crack down on illegal layouts. Hegde said: “The government order (GO) strengthens implementation of plan proposals and goes with the masterplan being prepared for cities including Bangalore.’’ After repeal of Fragmentation Act of revenue department in the late 90s, there has been a spurt in acquiring agricultural lands for residential and commercial purposes without legal sanction. This also led to large violations of Green Belt area.

The onus is on the local area planning authorities concerned, municipal bodies or town planning authorities to streamline development in the green belt, while the revenue department plays a key role as the registering authority.

Green belt is a zone which permits agriculture, horticulture, dairy farming, milk chilling centres, highway amenities such as filling centres, weigh bridges and check posts. Under special circumstances, uses permitted are: places of worship, workshop, school, library and residential development not exceeding two floors, within area reserved for natural expansion of villages.

“But layouts are registered without following guidelines, as a result of which violations are rampant.

There is no space for infrastructure, properties are sold without approval from the sanctioning authority, but registrations are duly done by the sub-registrar,’’ town planning experts rued.

GO bans registration of the following

Sale, gift, exchange, mortgage, agreement to sell or lease a site with or without building in agricultural land, which is not converted from non-agricultural purposes, described as a gramathana site, for which no layout plan is approved and a release certificate is obtained from the competent authority.
The notification does not apply to documents relating to sale, gift, exchange, mortgage, agreement to sell of a site on revenue land for registration under Ashraya scheme, HUDCO, other government sponsored housing schemes.

3 Comments:

At Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 4:05:00 PM GMT+5:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The recently notified changes by the Karnataka Government to land registration rules is a bold and welcome step.

In the recent past the outlying areas surrounding Bangalore has seen unplanned growth. This has resulted in residential layouts being formed in a haphazard manner without the approval of the Planning Authority. These layouts lack basic civic infrastructure and with no land being reserved for civic amenities like parks and schools.

No doubt there was a dubious nexus between owners, developers and authorities by which these layouts were sanctioned and developed. Gullible and desperate buyers flocked to own land to build homes. Speculators invested in these layouts sure of making a fast buck.

In this context a new role has emerged for BDA. All layouts developed by BDA and its predecessors in law are model layouts with adequate infrastructure and amenities. This is because, despite criticisms against its functioning, the basic rules of Town Planning were followed. Since BDA is not involved in wanton speculation it was able to offer well developed land at affordable prices.

Having taken the first step by stopping registration of unplanned development the Government must now move to address the lacunae in law and procedures pointed out by the High Court in the Arkavathy layout case. Only if this is accomplished will Bangalore grow in a planned manner.

 
At Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 8:04:00 PM GMT+5:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

At first I was upset with this new regulation but a second look indicates that it may not be a bad thing if BDA has bandwidth to work on many layout formations and approval process. Looks like the primary purpose was to stop unplanned residential layout formations and govt used it's revenue wing to enforce this. Seems like now the builders will have to go to BDA/others to get approval and pay betterment charges to build the layout.

 
At Thursday, May 12, 2005 at 5:00:00 AM GMT+5:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is a very good GO, even though it may be bitter in the short term but fetches good results in the long term.

Legal experts from BDA should release information on what is acceptable and what is not, since its giving lot of hardships to a layman, who are again taken for a ride by the middle men.

For example: No construction of any type is allowed on agricultural land.

Should state clearly, whether BDA or BMRDA or BIAAPA approved layouts are registerable, as per this new GO?

Where can the complete text of this GO is available.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home